![]() ![]() Overall, both tools are handy for developers and coders who need assistance understanding or implementing code. This would be much faster for ideation and coding than having an AI tool coding with me as I go through the prompts. While ChatGPT cannot offer the same interactive programming experience as GitHub CoPilot, it can undoubtedly provide a great deal of assistance regarding coding questions.Īnd to be honest, I prefer ChatGPT’s style more, where it gives you an answer and allows you to use and edit that code to fit your style. It provided detailed responses and explanations that I would’ve had to sit down and think about for a long time (while it responded in about 3 seconds). It says that when viewing branches, the context. ![]() GitLens’s README indicates that GitLens supports rebasing. If you want to do your rebasing in Visual Studio Code instead with the git command-line tool or with a Git GUI, you can install the GitLens extension for VS Code. I think it actually did better than I could have with the same coding set. I don't think Visual Studio Code has Git rebase functionality built-in. That being said, ChatGPT was remarkable in its ability to answer questions about Python functions. This is because GitHub CoPilot is designed to help and code with the user, while ChatGPT receives a coding question and simply answers it. When comparing ChatGPT to GitHub CoPilot, it’s not exactly an even comparison. Winner: ChatGPT, but not really apples to apples. Basic knowledge of Git concepts such as repositories and cloning, as described in Using Git version control tools in Visual Studio Code. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |